Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smosh Survivor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted as a non-notable website/event. (aeropagitica) 22:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smosh Survivor

ATTENTION!

If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether an article is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads (or socks).

You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing!
Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}.

Absolutely non-notable per WP:WEB, especially on its own. One ghit, which is WP's article on Smosh: ^{[Check Google hits]}. (|-- UlTiMuS 12:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fails to assert notability in the article. Speedy delete as {{db-web}}. Tonywalton | Talk 12:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete No notability asserted, as no notability exists. -- Kicking222 13:26, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete - No notability, and what the heck is smosh? To give the creating editor some credit, there are some other headings in the article, it looks like it may be a work in process? Maybe give them a day or 2 to expand the article to see if it becomes something more notable, or at least more descriptive to what it is. There are not alot of "spam" links at the bottom, so I am leaning towards a weak delete.Chris Kreider 14:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this is what a smosh is. Smosh's videos have been seen by millions of people worldwide and have even appeared on mainstream television. It says here. Tonywalton | Talk 14:35, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link! I still have to recomend a delete unless somebody adds substantian content to the article. Chris Kreider 14:58, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Certainly not notable. Andre (talk) 01:08, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

keep It's being updated, give it a couple days, it is indeed notable. --71.193.47.23 01:12, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Weak Merge. As it is, this article should be deleted completely. It doesn't do what an encyclopedia article is supposed to do. It doesn't inform someone about a topic that they have not heard of before. It's confusing. It looks like an "inside joke." It doesn't explain to the outsider what is going on, and why anyone outside the Smosh.com forum participants would even care. Even with the promised updates the best we can hope for is a MERGE, but I'm not holding my breath.OfficeGirl 01:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete for obvious reasons. --- RockMFR 14:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't delete: There's a lot of information on this and there is too much to merge it into the Smosh Article.--Ngard039 14:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.